The scientist Jane He Jiankui He said Monday he had an in vitro contamination with a modified gene that gave real blades despite the AIDS virus, a recital that has taken its position from the university where it works and its; Criticious criticism for an action that is considered "dangerous" and "unreasonable".
The researcher, trained at Stanford in the United States and explained the running of a specialized lane in the genome in Shenzhen, explained that he had used the procedure Crispr-Cas9, known as "genetic scissors", which allow them to remove and replace the non-selective parts of the genome, because a lump is corrected in a computer.
The babies, called "Lula" and "Nana", were born with an in vitro product of modified embryo before being introduced inside the mothers.
Current modification DNA it can avoid disease, but this is a problem because the genetic changes are inherited by the new generations.
An University of Science and Technology (SUST) from the University of Shenzhen already announced that he stopped it He Jiankui and that he or she investigates whether his tests are against ethical and academic regulations, according to their MIT Technology Review.
The university said he stopped his salary since February and thought that fertilization by a modified genera represented "to break the ethical criteria of the academy and its rules."
This medical test was reported before the beginning of a conference of genome experts in Hong Kong when China's researcher needs to give his findings in detail.
However, following the complaints received, it will not be assaulted in this genetics communication.
The diagnosis of this self-deception was not independently verified. The Chinese team did not produce its product in a scientific magazine.
"Very problematic" test
After the statement, many Chinese scientists and scientists criticized this test. A hundred of his Chinese co-workers published a statement in which they criticized the test and asked for the legislation to change in vitro tissue.
In addition, international researchers criticized the fact that the news was made via YouTube on a video
"The production of these results in a YouTube video is a difficult scientific habit," a & # 39; Nicholas Evans, a professor of philosophy at Massachusetts University of Lowell in the United States, works on biological issues.
"This moves away from the control processes that have a lot of scientific progress, such as peer evaluation," he said, questioning AFP.
Whether it is named, or not, the case raises "severe serious concerns," said Sarah Chan University of Edinburgh, named by the Center for Science Media.
"It's likely to make such applications, most likely trying to disagree (…) inconsistent," he said.
Jiankui did not respond promptly AFP.
Information about AFP