A woman who says that kidney reform was introduced into "death penalty" after she developed cancer from the organic organ who wants to investigate.
Pauline Hunt, 49, was from Kilmarnock in Ayrshire, who thought she gave up a new life in December when she got the new organ.
But she now has the lymph tools and she has told her she is too ill for chemotherapy.
The Scottish Government said he wanted to learn any lessons from that.
The suppression hospital and authorities confirm that safety protocols have been followed and a recognized risk of cancer spread is underestimated.
Pauline's hooks were re-designed at Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Glasgow in December 2017.
Pauline thought it was the second chance.
"I woke up the next morning and I was a good feeling. We were just on this new life.
"I was right for a few weeks and then I got this growth just over the hook's bed. They said it was fluid. But by the end of January I did not feel good again."
Ten weeks after the organism was given, Pauline's doctor told her she had to remove the hook.
The person who got the liver – one in Newcastle – had died after developing cancer.
After the surgery, it was confirmed that Paul's cancer, formerly a caretaker.
"He was a death sentence," she said.
"I do not know how long I am. I have obtained cancer from a contributing factor who should be so healthy that this should not happen."
Pauline expects changes to the system to ensure that this is avoided in the future.
She said: "It should not happen. But he did, and I can not do anything to turn that back.
"But if this is the point that they change something, we win it.
"Not even my cancer I'm currently fighting, it's someone else's cancer that makes it harder for me.
"No one should have someone else's cancer fighting."
John Forsythe, the Medical Director for Organic Donation and Re-removal of Blood and NHS Trafficking, said: "We are aware of this serious issue and our thoughts are with the people who receive them and their families.
"We can prove that an investigation has found that all processes have been followed correctly.
"For all our donors, we will carefully review their medical history and make new tests. If anomaly is found through the re-collection of organs , we will do a biopsy. "
He said that a donation had to be repeated and replaced quickly and they usually followed unexpected death.
"In rare cases, the donor can not have a small tumor that can not be done with the tests that can be done in the limited time available before re-inserting," said e.
"This means that there is a recognized risk of uncertain cancer distribution, although thankfulness is very strange."
There was a reimbursement of 4,039 people from donations that died in the UK last year.
The risk of cancer is given from a contributors to the person who gets out about 1 in 2,000 replies.
Between 2001 and 2010 in the UK, 15 out of 30,765 recipients were re-planned with donations given to gifts, and three died as a result.
During the same period, 4,093 patients died while they were waiting for replacing.
The Scottish Government spokeswoman said he was "a very serious case".
He said: "Despite detailed studies and exams on groups that have been donated by specialist medical staff, as there is a small amount of time in which a contribution must be made and replacing, Fortunately, all the dangers that may be discharged can not be reduced.
"The health secretary is trying to make sure that all investigations have taken place on Ms Wright's case situation so that any lessons that can be learned are set, & # 39 ; including the review of NHS Blood and Transplant. "
A spokesperson for NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde said: "Repeated process, including disorder, has recognized risks and are carefully discussed at different levels in in preparing the patient to re-issue.
"In this case, two of our senior clusters have both content progressed with the re-abolition of this hard process.
"Both patients and their families were fully informed of this research and found their result that the situation could not be expected and that the cure and the conclusions clinically appropriate and complete completely with the strict protocols for replacing. "