Thursday , April 9 2020
Home / canada / Democratic president candidates talk about Google Nest microphone

Democratic president candidates talk about Google Nest microphone

Consumer privacy in the time of large technology companies such as Facebook, Google, and Amazon may not be subject to heat or healthcare quality, but to enter the 2020 president election, certainly it's a & n; steaming.

Every Democratic candidate who attempts to face them must face his / her face; Trump President requires the privacy of users in the current age of smartphone mobile, mobile information and data breakdown that takes place every day.

With Tuesday's news that Google let users know about hidden microphone users in their Nest security devices, some Democratic candidates took the opportunity to express their privacy, especially because Is it a? related to consumer technology.

California Senator Kamala Harris responded to Nest's news, telling Insider Business in an email statement: "The Americans should not be scared that their home-based materials could be able to; watch them. "

Harris has been struggling with technological companies in the past before they have lost the information of secure customers.

When the Mark Commander Facebook Mark Zuckerberg announced before the Congress in April last year, Harris set out an issue he concluded with the 34-year-old billionaire who alleged that he should The company allows the 87 million people to may have an impact on Cambridge Analytica and to be able to; information.

"It is not easier to request a petition or to request" or "in good print" the operating privacy policies, "said Harris to Business Insider." But those who are technology companies Falling down regularly. "

Another assistant, who was the final president of 2020, was a democratic president in Maryland, saying that it is hard for Google to have the right information about a security device Nest is an example of why private legislation needs to apply to a wide range of technology products, just the data collected on the internet or on mobile phones.

Food labels for tech products

"[We] they must give laws that need to be & # 39; publishing privacy-related issues longer than mobile devices, that's what everyone thinks slowly, "said Delaney." Systems that are applied to people's homes, have private effects. "

Delaney reflects the lack of information about consumer technology technologies today to foodstuffs before the Food and Drug Administration made it a law that would have to include materials on leaflets.

"We have our needs through the FDA on a label. And so it was clear that there was a time in the history of this country when we did not have these things and that the society had made more progress in achieving. Thinking about the needs of his citizens and said, "Hey, this is a good thing for us to protect our citizens," Delaney told us. "And that's the procedure here, appear on electronic devices. That does not means that you need to describe how small you are. But it's a means that if there is a device-related device, it should be spread. "

John Delaney
Associated Press / Jacquelyn Martin

By Tuesday, Nead informed users of their package or on their website that a microphone was set up in the # 39; Nest Guard – a leading center of Nest secure home security. Although the microphone was not possible, Google advised this week that it prevented users from being able to know about being there.

"It was not expected that the microphone was always a secret machine and should be listed in the tech specs," said Google speaker to Business Insider earlier this week . "That was a mistake on our behalf."

From Thursday, the Nest updated website was to include a description of its & # 39; microphone in the Nest Secure designation page.

More lawyers are worried – "another creepy tech company"

There were several other lawyers who stressed that the Nest Google result had the secret microphone.

General Virginia, Warner Mark Warner, who is the principal advocacy and vice chairman of the Information Committee of the Assembly, told Business Insider that Google does not have to display the parts of his security device "totally compared to customer expectations."

"A normal speech point that users do not care about confidentiality has been increasingly unsuitable, as we learn that policy makers and policymakers are held in the dark for years of collection and commercialization practices, "said Warner. "There is a need for two responsible loyal groups and US Congress to show light on the dark subcocks of the digital economy, and include how the owners the smart home system system in ways that can be uncomfortable and competitive. "

Read more: A leading privacy advocacy agency requires FTC to take Google away from the Nest business after telling users about hidden micro

Senator Oregon Ron Wyden, Democrat who is a member of the Seirbheis Fiosrachaidh Committee, has taken into account the need for better transparency when it comes to consumer technology.

"All sensors in each electronic device should be clearly identified to consumers before being bought," said Wyden. "The Americans may choose to make different sensors in their homes or their packs for the resources they offer, but they must always know that they are doing it, and it must always be a choice. "


Senator Missouri Haw Hawley named Nest "another company of other technical classes".

"This time, Google is not going to analyze users with a secret microphone, is used for who knows what – and here we are again with requests for forgiveness, "said Hawley, Republican. "The American people are smart of these activities and it's time for those technological giants to be accountable."

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, who said on September, said he wanted big technology companies such as Google and Facebook to be "broken as the federal government made Standard Oil over a hundred years back "- which also affects its & # 39; recent Nest phone number.

"Google may be the most legal and technical company in the world. To say that" bend, we forgot "was very unhappy," said Landry ri Business Insider. "Some apologies seem to be always. It's always getting old."

When we asked the applicant who is planning to move his own search to Google after his most recent privacy process, Landry said: "I did not close the a door on any route to protect the privacy and interests of Louisiana liberators. The Association of General Defendants, I will definitely talk to my colleagues about this issue as we will a range of issues that affect our states and the countryside. "

Source link