There is no virus found among Atlantic salmon & Bring the lowest risk to Fraser River sockeye – DFO – Cowichan Valley Citizens



Fisheries and Coasts of Canada say that the virus of a Atlantic salmon in the Discovery Islands is "to reduce the risk" for Fraser River sockeye salmon, although many Still uncertainty about living and how to live; spread.

Expert committee members reported Thursday reporters about orthoreovirus piscine, or PRV. The clan chiefs were made earlier this week when a Federal Fisheries and Canadian Oceans (DFO) Federal Court judge returned to let young salmon enter your webpages open to be screened for her & # 39; virus.

But scientists commented on the Thursday conference the dangers of PRV to Fraser River sockeye were so low.

"At the moment there is no evidence that suggests PRV-1 causes disease and death in sockeye salmon," said Gilles Olivier, one of the joint review committee chairs.

PRV comes from Norwegian, and has been infected there for several years, but the virus is in B.C. who had "lower genetic variability" and is not as damaging as a salmon at its shoreline; B.C., he said.

"Atlantic salmon does not appear to have the same effect here in BC, on the West Coast, as it will be in Norway," said Olivier, an old DFO water health officer who – retired.

Research shows that even & # 39; s high viral loads of B.C. The rate of PRV in young Atlantic and sockeye salmon is not dying, he said.

The review data also shows that the virus is very common among Atlantic salmon in web pen farms and among chinook salmon throughout its; Northwest Pacific.

"It has a broad geological spread among wild salmon and Pacific in BC, Alaska and Washington, but a lower level than agricultural salmon," said Olivier.

He said that his virus can not be on his or her culture, mean that scientists are responsible for finding specific molecular tools and techniques.

"It's not easy to work with this virus," he said.

Many are still uncertain about how the virus and behaviors are in B.C. coastal waters, Dr Craig Stephen, another co-chair of the inspection committee, said.

A high degree of uncertainty continues to continue because of "data gaps around things like how big the virus is in the water … how good is the virus on? to live, "he said. "The normal presentation modules can not be done."

Stephen is Head of Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperation and professor at the Western College of Medical Medicine.

There were 15 DFO participants in the 33-person review committee. Other members came from environmental and indigenous, academic, and aquatic farming companies, along with other government departments, according to DFO's press release.

The committee met for three days in Vancouver last month to examine evidence relating to the release of PRV from Atlantic maritime salmon in the Discovery Islands to Fraser River sockeye, said Jay Parsons, chief executive of DFO.

No data from the review process has been issued to reporters. DFO stated that a "comprehensive report on review findings" will be published on the Canadian Science Administration website in the spring end, following a final review by committee members.

The PRV survey was the sixth in a series of 10 risk assessments on spread of agricultural salmon spreads in the Discovery area, Parsons said.

The risk assessments are part of a response to a federal investigation on the Fraser River sockeye salmon stocking of a pirate stock with a & # 39; commissioner Bruce Cohen. The Cohen Commission report was circulated in 2012.

Last year, a DFO-led survey found that PRV causes breakdown of the cells of their wild salmon cells, and # 39; leading to "destroying plants and hooks, anemia and death," according to Ecojustice, an environmental law charity.

On Monday, the Canadian Federal Court completed a policy that allows young salmon to be moved to fish farms based on ocean without scrapping for a virus. This was followed following objections with Namgis First Nation and by the biologist scientist Alexandra Morton, who was a unique belief of open fish farms.

Justice Cecily Strickland found that the DFO threshold for the appropriate damage to wild salmon was too high and that his policy did not fulfill his precautionary principle. The court also found that DFO was so hard to have a duty to consult & # 39; Namgis First Nation about PRV.

The federal government gave Strickland four months to review the policy. DFO refuses to comment on his plans at a Thursday conference call.

Like us on Facebook and we continue Twitter


Source link