Cancer care: England still goes behind the best



[ad_1]

Woman with MRI scanPhotocopy
SPL

Sorry for England to close the gap on the best countries when it comes to cancer care for 20 years of being able to do it; try, analysis and suggestion.

The Health Foundation survey said the government agenda between 1995 and 2015, despite four strategies that had ambitious ambitious aims, the NHS was still in a position; to continue.

He said that if services were developed, 10,000 lives could be saved annually.

He was convinced that earlier judgment was important, he said.

Professor Sir Mike Richards, an old government cancer car, who was in charge of the review, said that patients were getting too tough to go. accessing the exams and scans.

"Although progress has been made, the objectives of all these strategies have not been met."

If you can not see the NHS Administrator, click or tap hereSouth Westerly

He said that the number of life-saving opportunities was saved alike with "a jumbo of people who dropped out of the air every two weeks".

It is only a month after the First Minister made an early commitment to cancer as a priority for NHS costs in future years.

Most severe and most severe cancer waiting times & # 39;

How far behind the NHS?

Continuity levels are improving. Back in 2000, 62% of patients resided for at least one year. By 2015, this proportion rose to 72%.

At the same time, a five-year survival has risen from 42% to 53%.

But other countries have also become better. The Health Foundation clarified the UK's performance against five other countries – Canada, Australia, Denmark, Norway and Sweden.

This was done for six main pensions – colony, correct, chicken, lung, ovarian and prostate.

For each, the UK has remained in the highest base since 2000 for a five year period. It is only on a chest cancer that it has closed with the best gap.

The tank identified figures that trigger 10,000 deaths annually with better judgment. That represents one in 13 deaths from illness.

What is the problem?

Sir Michael talks about the "retaining a gate" in the NHS.

He stated that there was a patient's emphasis on not having a lot of patient referrals, although the NHS did not have enough equipment or staff to carry out all the tests and that it would be bored; better.

This opposition needs huge investment, the report said.

Family doctors talk about almost two million patients a year for emergency tests and scans – almost four times the number they did over ten years ago.

But the increase in cross-shots is at the same time as long waiting times, with the NHS now struggling to meet its targets.

Photocopy
Getty Images

And despite the extra numbers given, one out of five cases is still proven through an emergency display in places such as accident and emergency units.

A patient is not allowed to sign on this route to a # 39; survive because the cancer is proven late.

Sir Mike stated that services had been protected by the Health and Care Act 2012, which led to the breakdown of regional cancer specialists as part of the health service.

He said this had inspired many experienced professionals to leave the NHS.

What does the government do?

Sir Michael welcomed the fact that the government promised additional funding – an additional £ 20bn a year before 2023 – and that cancer would be a key objective for that.

Last month, the new prime minister promised a new strategy to ensure that three-quarters of cancer were tested early – at present there are only half of them.

The NHS of England is already rapidly piloting critical diagnostic clinics. This is one-stop testing centers especially where patients can access a range of specialists and methods often on the same day.

Sir Mike said these steps would help.

He also asked that more would be done to raise public awareness of the signs and the signs to look out – research; show that people in the UK are sometimes willing to come forward when they show cancer signs.

And he said that the NHS had to look at new approaches, aimed at researching that people who are at great risk of lung cancer could benefit from a new screening for the disease by a & # 39; using low dose CT screens.

The Department of Health and Social Care stated that "early priority development" was a "key priority", and Showing from next year that a new 28-day target for a review would be distributed.

Read more from Nick

Nick continued on Twitter

[ad_2]
Source link