Huawei: why does the United States think that the Chinese technician giant is a danger to protecting national security



Meng Wanzhou, who is a financial director of his company, was arrested in Vancouver on December 1. Detailed information on the arrest was not released, but the United States monitored Huawei for a & # 39; preventing sanctions against Iran.

The installation in Canada was Meng Wanzhou, the founder of Huawei, a major Chinese telecommunication service and the company's finance director, a political storm between Washington and Beijing.

Although the taxes against Wanzhou were not first recorded, they were learned to be arrested when the United States were asked, who believed that their company had been arrested. Breach of the sanctions against Iran.

China asked to activate its activity and proclaimed it as "human rights restriction."

Huawei, with 15% of the world market, is the world's largest cell phone maker in the world, is banned in a number of countries in the West because they are afraid that Beijing will " 39; company to publish business rights and another confidential information This could pose a national security at risk.

Countries such as the United States, New Zealand and Australia have blocked the giant for security reasons. Although others such as Canada, Germany, Japan and South Korea, company under review.

Huawei, for his, defending his independence, is convicted of the allegations and his; Declares that it is a private company.

Is Huawei a danger to national security?

The United States argues that Huawei is a danger to protecting national security.

And Washington explains that end for founder's links with the army (Ren Zhengfei is a former officer of the Liberation Army Liberation Army) and because of its significance. He has been growing everywhere in the world.

Huawei has grown rapidly in the market for a device that has been installed. cell networking works. He is currently na the world's largest communications device provider.

Just as China lives in a place that is a is becoming increasingly important in the world, the same is the technological giant

Theoretically, technology is at the heart of the most important communication networks that deliver to the company spy ability or barrier Communicate in any conflict, especially in a context where more and more materials work through the internet.

The United States is particularly concerned about a rule agreed in 2017 by the National Information Group of China, which says companies "support, co-operate and cooperate with national information work."

Following the agreement of that rule, United States, Australia and New Zealand prohibit their local companies from using Huawei to make the technology that is available; allows for use 5G Networks.

There are three members of the group that share information information called "The 5 eyes". Canada is the fourth country of the fourth country, which is currently reviewing its relationship with the company.

And the UK has so far not to make any decision against its & # 39; company, although it has been asked to resolve problems that represent "new dangers" for arranging the network.

What does Huawei say?

A company has been shown as a private company with the owners of employees and has no connection with the Chinese government, beyond its taxation duties.

Huawei says that he is a security in one of his priorities and that his & her; That part of the disruption that suffered because of the company is seen as commercially hazardous.

In the meantime, China's own government has proven that the Huawei results are a result of "defensive practices and discrimination".

The new program of opposition against its company is Coming between Washington and Beijing, and President Donald Trump, eliminating China of unfair business practices and help stealing intellectual property to American companies.

On the other hand, as a number of countries aim to simultaneously introduce 5G communication networks, the situation has become more competitive for companies trying to win contracts.

"There is a normal war" behind the scenes, says Emily Taylor, of a British research center Chatham House.

"I think the commercial benefit of setting standards that is appropriate to local technology providers is also something that is involved."


Source link