China will analyze a scientist who says they have done it; first genetic copy • Forbes Mexico


Reuters.- Health and medical philosophy officials in China on Monday investigated scientists' reports that put YouTube videos saying they have changed their birthdays earlier this month, which would be means that he created his first genetic modified baby.

The University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen City, in the south of China, with a chairman associated with his scientist, Jiankui, did not know about the project and that the person- research on unpaid leave from February.

I've been defending what he says he has done, saying he has done the genetic editing to help him; protect future infants with AIDS disease. But the university said that the study "is constantly disturbing the values ​​and academic standards," and despite world-wide experts, is clamed very dangerous.

The entity recounted a report in five videos published on Monday that it used a genetic editorial technology called CRISPR-Cas9 to modify the species of Lulu and Nana relatives, the names of babies according to it.

The Chinese National Health Commission said it was "very worrying" and ordered it to the regional health authorities "to investigate immediately and clarify its case." "We need to be responsible for the health of people and we will do this according to law," he said in a statement.

The Shenzhen Medical Ethics Committee said he was searching for a & # 39; case.

I have said in one of the videos that made the editorial process, called genetic surgery, "worked as safe as expected," and the girls are "as healthy as any other baby." It was impossible to determine the requests since the expert did not give written documentation about his study.

CRISPR-Cas9 is a technology that allows DNA scientists to beat and beat basically, offers hope for genetic solutions for infections. However, it also raises concerns about the safety and my virtues.

"If so, this test is very spectacular," said Julian Savulescu, a specialist in medical justice at Oxford University in the United Kingdom. Kathy Niakan, an expert at the Francis Crick Institute in London, said: "If it's true (…), this would be a very unreasonable, informal and dangerous practice of genomic editorial technology."

South Carolina University of Science and Technology said he would be vacant until 2021. He sent for comments, he said – Identifying dates – he had several years of volunteer license to focus his research.

"I understand that my work is controversial, but I think families need this technology. And I'm keen to criticize them," the scientist is argued in one of the videos.

In an earlier interview with Reuters, he said his aim was to give "lifelong" protection to infants against HIV, who started working in the second half of 2017 and recorded eight HIV couples -positive. Five had embryos, a & # 39; including the couple's parents, who were only marked by the nicknames of Mark and Grace.

You may also be interested:

Future Wars: with military and genetic engineering

Source link