Dennis Oland heard a murder case new Thursday information about evidence found in a woodland area on the west side of St John's more than a month after his father, Richard Oland, was killed.
A man called his police on 24 August 2011, found some of the pieces of paper next to his residence with their nickname, Dick, written on them.
The yellow footnotes also included his father's names, Philip Oland, the brother of Derek Oland, the active chairman of Moosehead Breweries, and his great-grandmother Susannah Oland, the matriarch of his family; leeks, the courtroom.
Defender lawyer, Allan Gold, raised the case when Const. Was inspected. Stephen Davidson about the relevance of the murder investigation of Saint John's Police.
Davidson met the man and found the building for any other evidence but said that he did not test the faster notes made for fingerprints and, and he did not see the value, due to the state of damage.
The gold praised that hair had been attached to one of the pounds and asked Davidson to have never been confirmed before. Davidson said it was not clear if there was hair or hair, but said he had not been submitted for exams.
He acknowledged that he did not show the papers to the victim's secretary, Maureen Adamson, or Robert McFadden's agent to see if they can recognize their handwriting or asking The multimillionaire had a & # 39; Use this type of transition notes in everyday work.
"Most of these papers did not find it right?" he asked him
"Right," replied Davidson.
The three pounds, which were brought into evidence, also list the names "police Mike Mark Mark."
Oland, 50, goes back for a second step murder in the death of his father. He was the best known for Richard Oland alive when he visited his father at Canterbury Street office on 6 July 2011.
The 69-year-old corpse was found in the office the next morning, looking down in a blood floor, with 45 strong and sharp injuries on his head, neck and hands.
Finding guilty offenders in December 2015, but the New Brunswick Appeal Court was convicted in October 2016 and ordered a new test, announcing a mistake in his / her judge's instructions ; jury judge.
The recall, which started on November 21, was deferred for the holidays to 7 January at 9:30 a.m. It is expected to last four months.
& # 39; Have I been & # 39; look too much CSI? & # 39;
The gold spent most of the Thursday to # 39; go through a laundry list of the things that the police broke out in the survey and challenging the steps they have made.
He said that police did not follow a basic clinical academic training. Officers who did not deal with the path or the door outside the victim's bloody office were part of the document; crime to stop any pollutants of evidence, said Gold.
They did not investigate the floor of the office where his body was covered, or the office door that would have been killed, was close for evidence, he said.
"Did I look too much CSI? "Gold asked Davidson." Is not it that we say to be done at the crime site – to investigate how careful it is and what can we do? looking for a search evidence? Is not that supposed to be done? "
"Yes," replied Davidson.
Police also did not test their ideas on a drywall stem to be a weapon that could be used to provide victims' wounds.
They did not support local trimmers to find out if someone had to put blood in.
And they did not get a record of the papers that were scattered with blood found on or around the victim's desk before they put the look back to the landowner.
Davidson was new to the main crime center when his police were called to 52 Canterbury St. on the morning of July 7, 2011, she heard her court.
He was one of the first officers on the scene and gave him an earlier evidence in the test that he opened and opened the door in the forehead, which was not confirmed -internally for genuine evidence because it was contaminated.
"You did not follow the rules of this crime scene, what did you do?" He asked the gold, his & # 39; refers to defamation from pollution.
Davidson said he was careful not to give anything to the office and did not. he went back to the steps. He did not think about the back door of the crime site, he said.
"Right or wrong, I opened it."
"It was not" right or wrong, "it was wrong," the gold gave.
"Yes," agreed Davidson.
"You would not do that today, would you do it?" Ask the gold.
"No," replied the officer.
The previous defense had advised the court that the quality of the Saint John's Police survey would be a major case in Oland's defense at the second phase murder recall.
In pre-test documents, the defense said they are going to argue "that [Saint John Police Force’s] An investigation into the killing of Richard Oland was unsuitable and also attempts to attack the conduct and credit of SJPF officers involved in the investigation. "
It came up again Wednesday during a straight study P.J. Veniot on Davidson about a security video from the Thandi restaurant, which is located across the street from the victim's office, by hand.
When using Mìli exhibition show from the first test to help Davidson to describe the two cameras and broadcasting areas, she stood gold to face her & # 39; court.
"Just to be clear, Justice, we created this," he said, describing the aerial photograph with colorful areas. "This was not part of a police inspection. This is not something that the officer did.
"As you know, the quality of police inspection will be a matter in this case, so I just want to be clear what you see there and the officer's evidence responds to defense work. "