In the current state of distributed telecommunications technology, which defines old phablet 2014 as the new basic size for its & Most Android handles, the Pixel 3 is still one of the best options for a renowned modern mobile phone in 2018 – and one of the last is without a sign. The same thing was true for Pixel last year. However, the mobile site was consistently uncertain for its recent appearance, decorated with checks deeper than its # 39 ; most of the smartphones in 2017, especially in comparison to such X iPhone, Galaxy S8 / Galaxy Note 8, not even its big brother Pixel 2 XL. This year, the Pixel 3 will become more lively like Google will; make their Pixel line for honoring him as the best leading partner of the team. look and feel, and many will; Start with our port on how we interact with it – the show.
So how did Google make this trip?
Summary of Performance
At this time, Google is sending the panel for smaller Pixel 3 from LG Display while & # 39; Samsung Display is represented for the XL – flip-flop changes since last year. At the same time, the face design looks very similar to the minified version of the Pixel 2 XL less than the curved 3D edges, which I am happy they are away. Its front is now flat and weak, and & # 39; including a new 18: 9 screen sex combination, which greatly reduces high, base, and side bezels, and even new chrome corners. The Pixel 3 body is around the same size as the Pixel 2 length & # 39; it is suited to a 5.5-inch long display, which has the same size of the screen with the Pixel 2 but half an inch of a real-time real estate structure. This short-screen could be done, however, that Pixel 3 will be more difficult to use the Pixel 2 handy, especially when they reach their status bar.
Pixel 3 has a simple pixel density equal to Pixel 2, with 443 pcs per inches compared to Pixel 2 and 441. At this pixel density, the display looks hard 11.0 inches (27.9 cm) for users with 20/20 vision, which is good because the normal speed for smartphones is less than 12 inches (30.5cm). The structure of the image, or the achromatic image, is very sharp down to about 7.8 inches (20 cm) for users with a 20/20 vision. However, the appearance of a color may be visible when you use the phone nearer 11 inches, and this is due to & # 39; The screen uses a Diamond Diamond Pixel range. Those with poor visual, which are very common, more sensitive to pages may be. Most of the items are rated, the Pixel 3 display is set at an appropriate screen congestion, just up to a pretty level.
The quality of the showcase of our display on our excellent Pixel 3 unit is at normal brush stages. At the first inspection, I also noted that the screen is much less clear and cleaner, and the display is now compiled closer to its; highest pixel than on Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL, and the final display was uncommonly glazed. The closer closer helps to screen the & # 39; appears much more "incy" as if the material of the screen was plastered or a strap was placed on a glass slab. However, the colorful color-resistant case with the LGD panels on Pixel 2 XL has gone on significantly, however, it is still visible when it finds it at a lower level. The development of the color of the display, when viewed on a part, is also greatly enhanced. The shift in color is much simpler and uniform, especially in comparison to most of the Pixel 2 XL units last year – it brought me five places into & # 39 ; get a Pixel 2 XL unit with a small color. Showcase & # 39; shows an analogy of colors of colors at different angles such as Samsung panels, just shifting uniformly tightening to any greens or magenta here and there. When color eyes are measured, the Pixel 3 has been proven to move color less than Pixel 2, but to slightly higher shift. The other side was true when we tried to achieve Pixel 2 XL unanimously: less gray movement, but a higher color change for Pixel 3. Note that there may be The Pixel 2 XL unit has anomaly – it was a & # 39; Most of the Pixel 2 XL units that I tested greatly changed a higher color. Our unit's equality show is also excellent, but the ineffectiveness of its start is to be seen at very few brightnesses. However, I have given users the opportunity to display poorly poor display, color grunge, and / or bad visual impairments, so it seems that "screenshots" are in types for an appropriate presentation.
For the Pixel 3 color program, Google has looked at it and now it's a # 39; depending on an extensive extension profile for Pixel 3, instead of an incorrect normal profile as they did for Pixel 2. The Adaptive image on Pixel 3 extends the colors to native gamut; panel, the gamut is very wide. Many colors are consolidated, and the appearance of a screenshot image is greatly enhanced. The colorful image of the color is the precise color, and we have calculated its calibration for colors unidentified from ordinary office lightsIn the West But, the gamma show is too high on Pixel 3, but it's not as high as it was on Pixel 2 XL. This means that, although there are right colors, the image of the screen will be more similar to the status. The colorful color photograph is similar to the Natural color image, but with a slight increase in color saturation. It is still very correct, and it may be more precise in outdoor light because display colors are filled with extraordinary light.
In outdoor light, however, the Pixel 3 is not quite competitive. Even in 2017 levels, the Google 3 Pixel is not quite clear. We measured the display to raise the height at 476 degree of clarity for its average case (50% APL) and its output; Most featuring about 435 in white backup apps. Although the phone is still used under sunbeds, it is not as easy to use as faster shows, such as iPhone or Galaxy devices that are more recent, which can easily reach around 700 nets for A white content, which appears 25% more smooth than the Pixel 3.
Exhibition Analysis Method
In order to obtain quality color data from the display, we will test test patterns into the handheld and distribute measurement; comes from the display to use spectrophotometer i1Pro 2. The test patterns and the gadget options we use are corrected for different display features and software outcomes that can change the measurements we want. Many exhibitions of other site exhibitions are not reporting to them and, as a result, the data may not be incorrect.
We will show the full crackdown of the show and we will; describes a moderate white color error, together with the associated color temperature. From our readings, we will also receive their gamma showcase & # 39; use at least squares that fit the theoretical range values of each step. This gamma value is more meaningful and better than those who report gamma reading from a demonstration calibration software such as CalMan, comparing theoretical gamma every step instead.
The colors we are targeting for our test patterns are & # 39; influencing ShowMate's detailed color collections. The color targets are too long around the CIE chromaticity scale 1976, which make excellent targets to evaluate the ability to display the color shape.
The color screens and color readings are produced in a 20% increase over the informal clarity range of the show and an average of achieving one reading that is right for the overall appearance of the show. Another reading will be made when we refer to 200 cd / m², which is a bright white standard for normal office and internal lighting situations.
In particular we use color difference measurements CIEDE2000 (shortened to ΔE) as a metallic for chromatic accuracy. ΔE The general business color difference proposed by the International Commission on Illumination (CIE) is the best of the & explain differences between colors. There is also another color difference, as the color difference Δu & # 39; v & # 39; on the CIE chromaticity scale 1976, but such medical evaluations have been lower in visual uniform when evaluated for visual awareness, as the doorstep for visual clarity between measurement colors and target colors can change wildly between color difference. For example, a color difference Δu & # 39; v & # 39; 0.010 is not visible to blue, but the same color is yellow for yellow. Note that ΔE it is not perfect, but it has become the different difference of current psychology.
ΔE usually consider luminance error when & # 39; counting, because luminance is an essential part to fully account for color. However, since the human visual system interprets chromaticity and luminance separately, we keep our test patterns by using the " Increasingly and giving the attractive mistakes an opportunity ΔE values. In addition, it is useful to divide the two errors when evaluating a display show because, as our visual system is, apply to various issues with the show. In this way we can carry out a more detailed audit of its performance.
When color color is different ΔE over 3.0, the color difference can be seen. When color color is different ΔE Between 1.0 and 2.3, the difference in colors can not be observed but in critical situations (eg when the color of measurement and the color of the target side of the house appear on the displayed display ), no, no, color is obvious and it seems right. Color difference is measured ΔE of 1.0 or less are said to be totally inappropriate, and the color of display is disinfected from the target color even when it is near.
A measure of power power is measured by the brush of the linear rebrand between the push-handset and its output; show clarity. Battery drainage is monitored and balanced over three minutes at steps of 20% of flexibility and test several times long & and which will reduce the outbuilding of external battery concerns.
Light Heavy Extreme
Our different comparison cards compare our most color to Pixel 3 compared to other weights. The leaflets are on the horizontal ferry at the bottom of its sheet; represents the multiplication for the difference in clarity that is expressed in the Pixel 3 display, which is based at "1 ×." How good & # 39; These are the displays in the diameter of each square meter square, or nits, recorded in logarithms according to Steven Law Power who use the person who, representing modes for the appearance of a point point, on its scale equal to the clarity of the Pixel 3. This is done because a human eye has a logarithmic response clearly. There are no other recordings that show clear values in terms of linear values; correctly represents the difference in the clear design of the exhibitions.
The Pixel 3 will achieve the same way as the # 39; Most of the past. The display will be distributed around 450 nits for content to & # 39; Most apps and up to 572 people at APL are low 1%. It does not appear to be a priority in the clipboard for they still have a & # 39; Falling in the final place in a clear way for banner shows every year. Signs have no clear mode in Pixel 3 sysfs, which are likely to be found on devices with Samsung DDICs long as Pixel 3 uses LGD technology. However, LGD's most recent OLED on the LG V40 supports a clear method, and if the Pixel 3 display is available, Using the same technology of display, theory should also be able to make a clear approach.
For Android Pie, Google has re-launched a new logarithmic reel. This is a pre-packed folder where Android has a clear slide to change the clarity of the show in a linear way. People see the mystery; of clarity on a logarithmic scale, not a linear scale, and so the old slip has not been successful in the clarity of the display. By trying to sort out the clear slide at night, it is possible to give a situation that is too dark, but move the slide in the ink on the right and the show is now a & # 39; behave your eyes. Sufficiently, the slide should be clear. The one-way line in the slide should be clearly as distinct as the highest position. However, I found that this is not quite the case, so I tested on clear Google mapping.
Your first search was & # 39; I did not move Google just as the slider is clear to select the byte value that n; Management of the presentation is clear, and I commented on Reddit about several months ago. Failure to map online value bytes, although the new glass slide opens a finger quotation in a logarithmic way.
This is bad.
Although Google showed some understanding of the person's awareness for a minute, they displayed at the same time as they do not. People are much more aware of changes in lower clarity, and they already recognize that they are in their blog posts. This means that there should be an added value that a & # 39; mapping to measure clarity. However, the value-to-clear design map is still linear. The problem with this is because Google decides that it has only 256 quotas; It may be possible to make a map clear, the lowest low values for the dark environments are aware of "stutters" or "jumps" clearly between each step, so when changing the color of display between these values is not clear enough. This also applies to the new Bright Adaptive when it converts to these colors to self-operation.
For concrete analysis, we found that the clarity is produced at a 1 2.4 slide set, and at the same clarity 2 the performance results are 3.0 a & # 39; come. There is a 25% increase in size. For a comment, it will take about a 10% change in a clear dimension to notice a difference in the image's clarity to move one member suddenly (even less for a vision sgotopic, under 3.0 nits). Therefore, an additional 10% change should not be made when they change the display color so that the move from one location to another can be changed; appear smoothly and not "wise". These prominent legs show up to about 40 miles of clarity, which cover about 30% of a clear range; pane! This explains why the smooth slide is changed in the & # 39; bottom bottom making stutter.
In addition, the logarithmic work that Google uses in the slider appears to have been intact. The half-way on the slide looks less than half the brightest possible. When I tested on the mapping, I found that the degree of clarity for a halfway was mapped to about sixteen away from the high elevation. By using Steven Power Law and his reporter for a source, this is a show about a quarter as clear as crop distribution. For more experiments, the level required for the display appears to be half clear as mapped to around 75% on the slide. Compared to Steven's Power Law, we found that Google is using a proxy user method of 0.25 instead of 0.5 for the slider. As a result, the display can be worse due to & # 39; The clarity is slowly stretching slowly when the slide is clear; move.
Handheld can come with a variety of different display protesters that can change the colors of the colors on the screen. The Google Pixel 3 maintains a previous method of Natural and Promotion method and its & replacing the old Adaptive image static prototype protocol.
The Natural profile is the exact color drawing that replaces the color of the sRGB color as the place of a basic color for the non-blog media. The image supports the management of Android 8.0 automatic color colors so that the profile can display color content, however, almost no apps are available. support him. The Pixel 3 is now hanging on its & # 39; new Adaptive profile. The color image does not comply with any status but is closer to its & # 39; color color target with P3 red chromatic, with green density between Adobe RGB and P3, and Rec. 2020 blue blue. The image is similar to its & # 39; A silent color profile on Pixel 2 XL, uncomfortable, as it also got a LGD panel. However, it was a matter that I saw, that the color picture is different from Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL. Indigenous gamut is larger than Pixel 3 than Pixel 3 XL, and since the Adaptive color image extends the screenshots to the native gamut, appear in a different way. Therefore, there is a lack of consensus between the two right hand shows from their usual color profile, can be seen on the home screen on display units in stores.
The Boosted profile is a Natural profile with a slight increase in saturation. The image also supports automated color control.
The gamma of the display determines the totally different image and the clarity of the colors on the screen. The current gamma is active that will be used on most displays; continue a power activity of 2.20. Higher performing gamma powers have a higher degree of color comparison and darker color mix, which is film industry. going on, but smart phones are visible in many light situations where gamma powers are not more suited. The gamma below is the log-log color-based color representation as shown on the Pixel 3 display with the corresponding auxiliary appearance: higher than the General line 2.20 which means the color color is lighter and lower than the line 2.20 level and The color of color appears darker. The rivers are scaled to logic from a logarithmic response to human eyes clearly.
Like the Pixel 2 XL display made by LG, Pixel 3's iconic contrast differences are very tall with darker color blends throughout its board, however, it's not so bad for Pixel 2 XL (γ = 2.46). The color image of 2.43 has a basic, compatible color image that is hard for a mobile display that many users use. For the Natural and Boosted profiles, gamma is higher than the sRGB color, as it was anticipated that the colors were first displayed with a gamma show between 1.8 and 2.2. By appearing in an extensive color, many content began to; Focus on wider color areas to be taught at 2.4 gamma, with cinema now running 2.6 outside HDR.
Although a gamma of 2.2 is still the aim of accuracy in color that is essential, OLED panels have historically experienced difficulties in achieving this target due to the OLED building of different clarity with APL content. Usually, the higher APL image will reduce color intensity throughout its; panel. To achieve a consistent performance gamma correctly, DDIC and display technology must be able to overlap over the TFT range to be normalized regardless of what; spread. Samsung Display has achieved this by obtaining the most recent display technology on its & # 39; Galaxy S9, Galaxy Note9, and the Google Pixel 3 XL, all of which are well-documented for all color and tone formats as a result. This is just another side where the LG Exhibition is currently behind.
Last year, both Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL received a critical criticism due to the unusual clipping black, with the LGD Pixel 2 XL as the worst guilty. We found that Pixel 2 XL had a clipping black grade of 8.6% at 10 and Pixel 2 equipped with Samsung compressed a 4.3% clipping black. This year, the Pixel 3 show has a 6.0% clipping black, which is a small development over the last year's LGD panel, but still very high. So far, only the iPhone X and iPhone Xs have shown that there is no black black over the 8-bit intensive 8-bit range, with the OnePlus 6 with a threshold of approximately 0.4%. Samsung devices have been famous for clipping, and Galaxy Note 8 is the last ones we've done for a clipping test, color intensity was lower than 2.7%.
It's an interesting finding when you use a full-range test pattern, the gamma of the show is that; Coming out is always very close to 2.20, no matter how clear it is, although the gamma display is changing when it is a bit; measure of continuous APL usage. This allows me to & # 39; Believe that Google's calibrators for Pixel 3 calibrate at an ongoing, uncertain APL.
The color temperature of the white light indicates how the light appears "warm" or "cold". The position of sRGB colors is a white point target with color D65 (6504K) color temperature, which is said to be a typical daylight of Europe. A white space target with color D65 temperature is essential in color format. Note, however, that it is not necessary for a white point to be almost 6504K to appear correctly; There is a mixture of colors with a similar color measure of 6504K that does not even appear white. So color temperature should not be used as a metallic for color color accuracy. Instead, it is a device to evaluate how a bright and white point of expression appears and how it is; move over the clear and terrain level. Despite the temperature of a display target color, the color of a white color should be constant at any intense, which would appear as a straight line in the list below. By looking at her & # 39; A minimum temperature temperature card is available, we will get an idea of how the panel will be able to; handle low driving levels before they can black-shake.
The color teas are color-related and most similar to just a few small ties. All accounts will grow deeper and more; come to darker colors. However, when dark-colored colors appear, a functional calibration will appear; begin to break down. At least 50% intense at the lowest degree of clarity, which corresponds to around 0.50 nits, colors and Heat very much before our light gauge has to reach a distribution measure of less than 25%.
Our detailed color collections provide readers with rough evaluation of color performance and display calibration motions. The picture below is the basis for the precise color targets, designed on the CIE chromaticity scale 1976, with the rings representing the target colors.
The target color circles have a radius of 0.004, which is the distance between a color difference between two pages on their cart. Units of different color differences are represented as red dots between the target color and the color of measurement, and one dot or more in general illustrates a clear color difference. If there are no red dots between the color of measurement and the color of the target, the measurement color can be safely measured correctly. If there is one red or greater point between the color and the target color, the color of measurement can still be correct according to the color difference ΔE, which is a better indicator of visual insights than the Euclidean asthma on its cart.
In her detailed color mode, the color calibration is in the & # 39; Natural profile is quite correct in each case, with a overall average is very accurate ΔE of 1.2Post Office In some cases, especially in a normal office and internal lighting, the colors are completely disinfected from being perfect (even in judicial situations) by ΔE of 0.8 Good, you did, Google.
In animation mode, the colors of the screen are still very correct, with a special difference in red, middle-blues, and high greens. There is a total overall average ΔE of 1.9. Amazingly, the above-blues are more detailed in this image, because they block their delays in the # 39; Natural profile. However, the reds are overwhelmed with more than any other color in this profile, with problems ΔE of 6.4.
After a full year of Android management, there is still a genuine shift. Because of this, we will eliminate your P3 color accuracy because there is no place at this time in Android until Google has done something.
From Pixel 2 to Pixel 3, the display range is increasing by 13%. A larger screen that requires more power to & # 39; toirt a-mach an aon dian àillidh, a h-uile nì eile air a bheilear a 'meas co-ionnan. Ach, tha am Pixel 3 a-nis a 'cleachdadh taisbeanadh LGD, ach tha Pixel 2 a' cleachdadh taisbeanadh Samsung, agus a bharrachd air adhartasan teicneòlasach adhartach, tha mòran de dh 'eadar-dhealachaidhean ann an teicneòlas fon uachdarain a dh'fhaodadh buaidh a thoirt air cleachdadh cumhachd.
Thomhais sinn an taisbeanadh Pixel 3 gus a bhith a 'cleachdadh aig a' char as àirde de 1.46 watts aig a làn-sgaoilidh, agus tha am Pixel 2, aig a bheil an ìre as àirde de dh 'fhuaim, a' cleachdadh 1.14 bhata. Air a choimeasachadh airson an dà chuid luminance agus screen, aig 100% APL faodaidh Pixel 3 2.14 candelas a thoirt a-mach airson gach watt, agus faodaidh Pixel 2 2.44 candelas a thoirt a-mach airson gach watt, a 'dèanamh taisbeanadh Pixel 3 14% nas èifeachdaiche na thaisbeanadh Pixel 2 aig APL 100%.
Tha taisbeanaidhean OLED a 'fàs nas cumhachdaiche nas cumhachdaiche agus nas ìsle na susbaint air-sgrìn APL. Aig 50% APL, bidh Pixel 3 a 'toirt a-mach 4.60 candelas gach watt, a tha a' meudachadh 115% ann an èifeachd thar a thoraidhean 100% APL. Ach, tha Pixel 2 aig APL 50% a 'toirt a-mach 5.67 candelas per watt, a tha 132% nas èifeachdaiche. Tha seo a 'dèanamh taisbeanadh Pixel 3 23% nas èifeachdaiche na thaisbeanadh Pixel 2 aig APL 50%.
Pàirt Litir Taisbeanaidh XDA Ùra
Gus cuideachadh a thoirt do ar luchd-leughaidh tuigse nas fheàrr fhaighinn air càileachd taisbeanaidh an dèidh a bhith a 'leughadh am mumbo-jumbo teicnigeach seo, tha sinn air ìre deireannach de litir a chur ri chèile stèidhichte air mar a tha an taisbeanadh a' coileanadh gu dà-chànanach agus gu cuspairich bho tha cuid de thaisbeanaidhean doirbh tomhas agus / no a tha fàbharach.
Bidh ìre na litreach gu ìre an coimeas ri mar a tha taisbeanaidhean ùra eile a 'coileanadh. Gus clàr frithealaidh a bhith againn, anns an sgrùdadh taisbeanaidh OnePlus 6 a bh 'againn, bhiodh sinn air ìre B + litir a thoirt seachad: tha an taisbeanadh nas soilleire agus a' làimhseachadh clipping dubh gu math; tha e glè chinnteach ann an dath sna cunntasan taisbeanaidh calibrata aice ach tha gamma taisbeanaidh àrd fhathast. Tha an dà bhuannachd a th 'aige thairis air Pixel 3, ged a tha e fhathast a' toirt seachad nithean eile a rinn am Pixel 3 math agus dona, a tha ga chur air adhart agus a bheir e an rangachadh B ann an àite Pixel 3's B. Gu h-iomlan, lorg sinn an OnePlus 6 feartan taisbeanaidh airson a bhith san fharsaingeachd beagan nas fheàrr, gun a bhith a 'breithneachadh cuid de na taobhan fàbharach (meud taisbeanaidh, an sgeul).
Bheireadh sinn seachad an ìre A de Galaxy Note 9: Tha dealbhadh dath air fìor dheagh shoilleireachd le modh soilleir, geamannan smachd gama, dealbhan. Ach, tha clipping dubh aice fhathast, agus fhuair sinn a-mach nach robh an cruth dath anns na cunntasan calibrata gu bhith ro mhòr. Gheibh an iPhone X agus an iPhone Xs an dà chuid rangachadh A + +: tha raon soilleir ann an làmh-sgrìobhaidh nas fheàrr gun a bhith a 'cleachdadh modh soilleir, nead dubh air a raon dian 8-bit, smachd PWM smart, an cruth dath as fheàrr a thomhais sinn, deagh ghama smachd, agus stiùireadh fìor mhath air dath le OS a tha a 'cleachdadh dath farsaing. Tha na h-eadar-dhealachaidhean a tha a 'toirt buaidh air an eòlas seo a' toirt cothrom dha tarraing air adhart air an Nota 9 stèidhichte air feartan an taisbeanaidh agus mar a tha am bathar-bog aige ga làimhseachadh, ged a tha nithean eile ann a dh 'fhaodadh daoine a bhith a' còrdadh ris an taisbeanadh Note 9 nas fheàrr, mar pròifil làn-shàthaichte no taisbeanadh taisbeanaidh.
Facal air Co-dhùnadh Prìobhaideachd Adaptive Ghoogle
Gu pearsanta, tha mi a 'tagradh gu làidir an aghaidh co-dhùnadh Ghoogle a bhith a' dol a-steach gu pròifil leudachaidh farsaing. I believe it’s a tasteless and a purely marketing-driven decision that hurts the Android ecosystem, as well as its designers and developers.
To fuel this point, Android’s own automatic color management, implemented in Android 8.0, is not supported in this color profile, which is already severely lacking support. Even Google’s own Photos app does not support viewing images with embedded color profiles in any other color spaceS an Iar- Google is undoubtedly most proud of their imaging prowess, and the Pixel line would benefit tremendously by capturing images in wide color (which their camera sensors support) and by being able to properly view wide color images, both of which Apple has streamlined in their hardware and their OS since the iPhone 7.
Because of Android’s incompetence in color management, there are millions of photos posted by iOS users that no Android display can faithfully reproduce due to its lack of software support, and that is mostly on Google to blame for not asserting a serious push for it. It has led the Android community to associate accurate colors with “dull” and “muted” when the problem is that their designers have been left restrained with the smallest color pallet availableS an Iar- Rarely are iPhone displays described as “dull” or “muted,” but rather “vivid” and “punchy,” yet they provide some of the most accurate and professional working displays available on the market—they don’t need to artificially oversaturate all the colors on their screens to achieve this.
iOS app designers are encouraged to use wide color, while most Android designers are not even aware of it. All iOS app designers design on the same accurate color profile, while Android designers pick and test on all sorts of different color profiles, resulting in very little color cohesion from user to user. An app designer may be picking colors that he or she believes are tasteful on his or her color-stretched display, but the colors may turn out to seem overly less saturated than they’d like on an accurate display. The opposite is also true: When picking saturated colors on an accurate display, the colors may seem too saturated on color-stretched displays. This is just one reason why color management is essential to a cohesive and uniform design language. It’s something so critical that Google is currently disregarding when they’re trying to create their own design language — one without wide color, restrained to a color pallet established over twenty years ago.
Want more posts like this delivered to your inbox? Enter your email to be subscribed to our newsletter.