In an open letter, scientists in China say that baby genes are crazy


SHANGHAI (Reuters) – More than 100 scientists, most of them in China, have been convicted as "crazy" and an informal geneticist application that has changed the genes of black girls born this month to create the first generation babies.

In an open letter to online distribution, The science indicates that CRISPR-Cas9 technology was preparing human embryos, dangerous, inaccurate and damaging species of biological medicine reputation and development in China.

In videos posted online, scientist, Jiankui, did what he did, he said he did the genealogy to help protect future babies with HIV infection, the virus that causes AIDS.

"The biological sciences survey for this research is called in only one. Human exams can only be just as crazy," a copy of the letter sent by the Chinese news website was mail. The Paper.

"The Pandora box was opened. We may still hope to close it before it's too late," said the letter written in Chinese and signed by around 120 scientists.

For graphic to define Crispr DNA editorial mode, click

Yang Zhengang, professor of Fudan University, told Reuters that he signed the letter because the behavior of a generation is "very dangerous."

The University of Southern Science and Technology, where he is a related professor, said he did not know the research project and had left unpaid since February.

China's National Health Commission on Monday said it was "very distressing" and ordered it to regional health officers "to investigate and clarify their case".

The government's medical justice committee in the city of Shenzhen, in southern China, said that he was searching for a & # 39; case, as the regional health commission of Guangdong, according to the Southern Mail Department, the middle of the state media.

CRISPR-Cas9 is a technology that allows DNA scientists to be cut and discarded basically, raising the expectation of genetic arrangements for disease. However, there are also concerns about its safety and its habits.

Statement by John Ruwitch; edited by Darren Schuettler

On Standards:Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
Source link