Above decline: Supporting the Arab East Arab league



To what extent is there an Arab summit? What is the point of the Arab League as a whole? Is it an anthronism? Buyer?

These are some of the questions Arabs and non-Arab members are looking after each annual ceiling ends with empty creels and little or no consensus on any of the urgent challenges opposite the Arab world.

Tunisia, like other host states, hoped that Mullach Tunis would leave a history of history. He hoped to see some significant progress on the most gruesome conflict in the area. Earlier there had been a few minutes before.

The Khartoum Conference of 1967 gave us three failings: not known, not in conversation, nor in peace with Israel. The 1974 Rabat Collection nominated the Palestinian Freedom Group (PLO) as the only representative for the Palestinian people. And then the 2002 Peru Conference took on the Saudi initiative, offering recognition and normalizing Israel as a result of withdrawal from all Arab lands.

But these results were out of date after wars. In Tunisia, hope for a big presence was instead of expectations for big results, and the opportunity for improvement eventually came.

Like most of the Arab summits, the Tunis Geography 2019 will be halted in history due to no impact.

Over loyalty and determination & # 39;

It was the president of Tunisian, Mohammed Beji Caid Essebsi, who was named "a ceiling of loyalty and determination" – an appropriate account of a gathering of Arab leaders who showed a lot of retorical theology and very little theoretical determination.

The leaders accepted dozens and ambitions which will be forgotten tomorrow. They did not make decisions as a result of any urgent challenge against the Arab world today; not the war in Syria, not the human disaster in Yemen, not the state that Libya did not, and indeed not on conflict with Israel.

The bar was so low and congratulations that Iraq was putting on top to just establish government, and Algeria was asked to help paralyze Libya with war. The league did not completely eliminate the Gulf crisis at the beginning of Saudi Arabia.

As expected, the conveners declined to call the Donald Trump, President of the United States, who gave American legitimacy on linking Israel in Golan Heights. But judging the lack of results as a result of recently rejecting Trump on Israel's agreement – that in Jerusalem – there will be little meaning..

The Arab League announced the message in December 2017 about the movement of the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, and the “negative assault on political solution” to the Israel-Palestinian conflict, and even as the 2018 summit is mentioned. T the great Words, but nothing apart was that a resolution of the United Kingdom General Assembly had been scrapped of the US movement.

The Arabian races have broken their own decision in 1980 to join up with any state that moves the embassy to Jerusalem. Any teaching at any time at the league and at this stage he will rest in the cold in the storm of Jerusalem.

Unsurprisingly, the Arab League have made a deaf ear to shout from Palestinians to follow their own resolutions. After all, it is incredible to build up relationships with people responsible for Washington for their livelihood and legitimacy.

Worse, the Arab response to Jerusalem was so great that it encouraged Trump to include the US's laws on their work and that of Arabic.

What about the weight from neighbors right away? Well, leaders of the Saudi and Egypt raised the spots of non-Arab, non-Arab boogeymen, repeating their warnings against Iran in relation to Arab affairs, with the lead one, the Secretary General Ahmad Abu Al Ghait, sharing the job of Turkey in the Arab world with that Iran.

Strangely though, these two countries are also standing for the return of Iran's biggest Arab ally, Bashar al-Assad, to the Arab League.

A league for themselves

Arabic leaders are, therefore, happy to play a cauldron but not to synchronize a particular strategy to deal effectively with the different regional and international powers coming. T the Arab world.

Likewise, they have failed to meet challenges within Arabia without having a more profound effect, even more when it comes to everyday life of millions of ordinary people.

They can apply for working in the name of a national security or national interest but are highly motivated because of their own non-democratic separation. In fact, these races do not provide any life with little or no effort to consolidate their power, including giving their problems to their neighbors by encouraging conflict and conflict. sustainability.

As pyromaniac firefighters, the leaders who let out the flamboyant fire that takes over the region are the ones who lit up the flames from the outset. T -machine.

To assert their genuine ambitions, Arab leaders say they will only spark the public interest ahead of the wider Arab world. But judging by its history and current situation, every such effort has come to an end with a poor failure to protect, not only the pan-Arab interest, but also the t the interests of the Arab countries in particular.

The beginning of the Arab uproar in 2011 has brought this crisis back into the Arab state. However, Arab leaders have generally opted to duplicate corruption and corruption, and continued in their zero policies, both at home and locally, which have left loyalty and Arab peace.

All this asks the question: Does it take time for the league to go away and die away?

The Arabs deserve to be better

The answer is yes, no. The problem is not the foundation, but the behavior of its members.

Inter-state centers are essential for the governance of our independent world system after centuries of colonialism, two world wars and global accuracy.

Like the European Union, NATO, BRICS or the United Nations, the success or failure of the Arab League is almost entirely dependent on the commitment of its members to the treaty. Despite the suffering of brutal languages ​​and cultures, Europe has demonstrated that the security and the success of the individual state have been together.

There are no fundamentals of interest in regional successes. They require political stability, insecure design, deliberate design, and above all beliefs in a common sense and confidence to meet them.

The European Union is very aware of this, as has been the casethe League is not. Rather than applying its economic, defense and cultural agreements, the Arab provisions today affect these blueprints for unity and prosperity, given that they are accumulating dust. on league headquarters shelves in Cairo.

And that's just so sad.

The 400 million Arabs, who share the same geography and history, bitter and sweet; people who worship the same God and share common respect in glorious history; people who write with the same alphabet, who are reading the same books, recite the same poetry and sing the same lyrics – they are worthy of at least one activity center which is t genuinely represents their collective will.

How the Arabian poet Khalil Gibran summarized it: The nation is divided into fractions, every bit considered itself as a nation.


Source link