The Labor Commission and Social Affairs closed the Chamber between Friday and Saturday when the changes to the income and pensions order were examined and they ordered that the step be brought. to the House on Monday morning, currently. The order then has to be returned to Senate for second reading and agreed in writing by March 29. The PD wants to abandon the order of pre-emption before it goes on. put on. At 5.15am, after ten hours of work in the commission, the Democratic Party has left the job because of the inadequate income for its representative producers. they were topped by the giant, Filippo Sensi, on Twitter.
Pension and degree
A change to the league for the agreed supply exceeds the limit up to 45 yearsIf the money is saved, eg at lower rates, of the degree. there is only one limit to be used for lighting saving: to have started work and pay contributions not before the first January of 1996. But why is this change in rules?
Avoid the risk of avoiding a constitution
The 45-year period, as seen by Senate technicians in the example of preparation of work, would have gone against the principle of Principality which sees us all equally before the law. And this was because the under-45s would have been lucky and they could take advantage of this opportunity to come up with a low cost while everyone else was. So the idea of breaking into the top 45 years is the time I have to start work since 1996 onwards. Why is this boundary non-statutory? Dini's reform of that year's pensions began. Any person who takes up employment after that period will be entitled to a full pension based on the actual paid contributions over working lives and not based on final salary. There would be a danger of not starting base being avoided as the beneficial route for cost-effective buying would only be possible with those who needed it, not with a choice but with strength, also a t pensions added.
Categories that are still excluded
Even in the new design, only price payments would be available to those who pay grants to INPS. Not all professionals – such as lawyers, accountants, architects, engineers, doctors, journalists – whether private pension funds are excluded – are excluded. They do not apply to the rule of the command. Individual banks should come along this route. But with the high pensions they pay and the amount of grants they collect, it does not look like the air.
On its citizenship pension, this can be brought back at the post office or bank even in money and is not normally loaded – and so on – on the card. income. The Social and Labor Affairs Commission have given the green light to recreate the change that allows the pension pension distribution to be used normally for the purpose of paying pensions.
Tick the charge fee, and then drag it back
When the provision was examined, a new fee was then paid on domestic workers and carers that the rapporteurs recommend their introduction to cover for early retirement. heavy workers. In the reform of M5S change then funding was made by Elena Murelli (Lega) and Dalila Nesci (M5S) for a 15% tax rate on domestic working relationships, which would have transformed employers. pay at taxpayers. Following the PD objections, and some uncertainty, the majority were withdrawn.
March 16, 2019 (revised March 16, 2019 | 16:55)