National Council: In future years party funding will be increased year on year


Gudenus, vice-chair of FP, has not been excluded, the date for new consular law was concluded t

Vienna (PK) In fact, party support this year should increase by 7.78%, as a result of inflation. However, the next 2% will only go. The ÖVP and FPÖ campaign was today decided by the National Council. Therefore the current profiling condition will be re-activated from 1 January 2019. This controversy means that savings in millions, as are the coalition parties, are taking place. however, the weighting has been, with the NEOS calculations, the cost saving saving, that was done for a quick time. The reason for this is, by law, for automatic subsidies to increase each year in future and not just when inflation does not exceed 5%.

The new valuation register also applies to other amounts included in the Parties Law and in the Parties Promotion Act. For example, this will raise the cost of campaign spending, the values ​​for donations of visible parties and the funding of the specific parties following European elections 2% this year and this will arise annually in future.

Only the coalition parties voted for the bill. This year alone, the parties would receive € 2.5 million less than under the proper Valorisierungsregel, the constitutional spokesman ÖVP Wolfgang Gerstl. Markus Tschank (FPÖ) spoke about savings of € 2 million. Once again proving that the consortium was saving money in the system, Karl Nehammer (ÖVP) and Philipp Schrangl (FPÖ), amongst others.

Both the ÖVP and the FPÖ stressed the importance of encouraging parties to the debate. There is a consensus, but only the NEOS, that parties should be carrying out a democratic system in Austria and that parties should be funded by the public sector, says Harald Stefan (FPÖ). This public support will also ensure that there is transparency.

This was also secured by colleagues of Stefan, Tschank and Schrangl. Public party funding helps to maintain the diversity of parties, says Tschank. In his opinion, the funding of private parties would be more prone to corruption. A key example of "buying" a party with "oligarch Austria" is gifts from the entrepreneur Hans Peter Haselsteiner to NEOS – in comparison, the FPÖ was independent, impartial and only the population. Schrangl says there are many ways to “give money” to a party, not just grants, but also through adverts or staff. The support of public parties is much clearer. An NVP member, Nehammer, will also consider public sector funding.

The future annual increase in party funding that is “fair and transparent”. Finally, party expenses would rise. The evaluation ensures that there is a party system, Chank is also sure.

NEOS and NOW greatly reduce or freeze party support

However, strict criticism of the new register came from NEOS. As well as the ÖVP and FPÖ, this does not provide total savings, but in the long and longer it incurred additional costs to taxpayers, led to Nicholas Scherak. T discussing them. According to its calculations, in just four years, temporary saving impacts will be replicated again. The second highest party funding in Austria is already at Austria and at the highest in Europe. "They don't get bigger, they get more and more taxpayers' money," said the constitutional spokesperson NEOS, saying the ÖVP and FPÖ talked about savings. However, at the request of NEOS to freeze party support at its current state and not discovered an adequate amendment to the vote.

Scherak also announced that there would be greater publicity in party funding and tighter sanctions to cover the top of campaign costs. The NEOS would make all public revenue and expenditure public, highlighting it.

Even the NOW parliamentary body could not affect the changes sought. In principle Peter Pilz can think of yearly value by encouraging political parties, but in his opinion, validity is not so valid unless the subsidy sums are reduced in advance. In his opinion, this should apply to the promotion of political parties in the federal states. Possibly this kind of movement could restore politics into society, Pilz believes. In addition, one would have done justice to the slogan "save in the system".

According to the NOW, funds made available may be used for private home payments, such as the long-term care allowance or the annual based monitoring allowance. One million people in Austria live at or below the poverty line, Mushroom explained. "But he has nothing valuable." The only people needing the opinion ÖVP and FPÖ were dependent on the parties. Pilz is also convinced that election campaigns could be much cheaper.

Another responsibility for Pilz and its colleagues is to prohibit donations to parties for state companies and private companies that participate in public tendering. “Nobody taking public contracts cannot fund parties”, he says, it should be clear that this could prevent companies from purchasing political influence through donations. In support of his application, Pilz introduced a motion for intention, which was largely rejected.

SPÖ wants to control the cost of a tougher campaign

Against the party vote bill SPÖ. SPÖ did not oppose the promotion of the parties, Muna Duzdar clarified. Finally, it represents an important column of democracy, but in his view, effective sanctions would be needed to significantly restrict the campaign's cost register. He was also involved with their colleague Thomas Drozda. The ÖVP in the election campaign for the National Council elections "smiled and deceived," Duzdar took over the challenge of costing the campaign at a rate of € 6 million, t there is a competitive advantage.

Duzdar and Drozda relied on the ÖVP not to comply with Chancellor Sebastian Kurz's publication, and party support is also growing this year. Instead, the waulking would "be scattered through silent and mysterious". It seems he wanted ÖVP and FPÖ people in Austria "for a non-stop sale," said Duzdar. "You will not save in the system, but in the people" it is infinite for Drozda in the future, although future party incentives will be suggested, but not for their care allowance. T .

The constitutional speaker ÖVP Gerstl pointed out that the SPÖ had dishonest opinions. Finally, SPÖ General Werner Faymann was the founder of the valid Valorisierungsklausel. It seems that the Social Democratic Party does not agree with the coalition recommendation because it would be better to pick up 7.8% in favor of the parties, rather than the 2%, in order to kill it. This led to the NEP MEP Gerald Loacker advising that the subsidy decision was established by Chancellor Faymann, but with the representatives of the SPÖ and the ÖVP.

Even more, the debate was marked with a balance between the fares. For example, BP Nehammer NPC MEP Pilz MP refused to speak about transparency and cleanliness in politics. The third President tried National Council Anneliese Kitzmüller to settle the minds, ÖVP tabled them the Lieutenant for the expression “Pharisee” for the SPÖ as a public order.

The Deputy Johann Gudenus is not issued

At the end of the agenda there was a request from the Public Solicitor's Office Vienna to challenge FP agents and to manage the club's chair, Johann Gudenus. It is claimed that this broke out in § 283 para. 1 and 2, which relate to the attack by encouraging. Most of the palace was followed by the National Council to the recommendation of the Defense Committee without removing Gudenus. ÖVP, FPÖ and NOW a 'see a link between Gudenus' political activities and the crime reported.

The NEOS had complained that FPÖ on "FPÖ-TV" and appearing on the party's Facebook page using racist clauses. It displays Card abuse with Ali a fez behaving.

Council of a new Law: Foreign Affairs Committee to give advice on 11 April

Finally, the majority agreed with the request from Members of Roman Haider (FPÖ) and Reinhold Lopatka (ÖVP) to set a date for 11 April 2019 for Foreign Affairs Committee to report on the Executive Bill t on Consular Law. The aim of the regulation is to use all of the consular activities, which are currently based only on the Vienna Convention on consular relations and in a suite of relevant laws, in its own law. The previous rules are unsuitable, he says in the notes.

Another session of the National Council (69th) attended formal communications and assignments. (Final national council) gs / jan

Applications & Contact: t

Parliament's Media Service at the Parliament's Leadership Service
Parliament takes the letters
Phone +43 1 40110/2272

Source link