HIV advocates should work with the Trump Administration to terminate HIV infection on our terms – Resource Center for HIV Stigma & Discrimination

Donald Trump delivered the Union State address

President Donald Trump delivered the Union State address in the House of Representatives House on 5 February 2019. (Credit: Doug Mills-Pool through Getty Images)

It is difficult to describe the feeling that came over me Tuesday night when I saw a promise from the President Trump "Lost AIDS in America" ​​during the Union State service. Certainly, President Trump was astonished – no interest in the life and wellbeing of people living with HIV in this country or in any country – time than His tallest speech on a year to talk about ending HIV disease, but he did not; that is. He was not angry; at the end of a person who spent his first two years in the office to do it; eliminating the healthcare safety network of the country and preventing HIV spending in its annual budget requests to; discusses the "we have made" prevents and cures HIV.

No, the solution and its decision in the # 39; The main idea that was carried over me when I was looking at the Union State. For many years, many of the efforts of HIV that are struggling to end HIV-related HIV infection have not been delivered with broad distributions of the political institute in Washington, with little and no # 39; initiatives that were carefully documented in the Transport to ensure that funding for HIV programming was not cut and anti-discrimination against offenders, offenders, and the suffering of people what's live with HIV. And now, the prospects to stop HIV infection in the next 10 years have been expected to launch a national television with a leader who had not named the director of a National AIDS Policy Office During the long-term conflict and the Consultant Advisory Council was so tired of HIV / AIDS President who abolished a good number of them in protest. The eerie was unusual and unusual, but once it was not so difficult this president calling for "Congress" the commitment to eliminate HIV disease in the United States within 10 years ", the factual reality becomes more accessible shine.

The information about the reserves for president's president; Ending the disease plan is still fatal, but the full shape of its Health and Human Services Department (HHS), Centers for Controlling and Disease Diseases (CDC) start focusing. In a blog post that was released with the Union State, HHS Secretary Alex Azar explained the administration plan to terminate HIV infection, which will show its plan for & # 39; fight opioid disease by providing targeted investment and resources for the 48 United States (along with Washington, DC and San Juan, Puerto Rico) with over half of HIV issues that have been proven In addition, with seven states where the disease has a significant impact on rural areas. At the end, the administration objective is to see a 75% reduction in HIV diseases in five years and a 90% reduction in 10 years. Special funding figures have not yet been issued, but HHS Deputy Secretary for Health Brett Giroir, M.D. that new funding would be included for the plan, as opposed to funding from other healthcare programs essential.


At the end, it's not & # 39; The biggest issue that emerges from this plan will be whether it would be effective in providing care for people who are in a position; stay with HIV and prevent new infections if implemented correctly, so that HIV community can rely on Trump's administration at its word. The answer is short, no, HIV applicants should have trusted in Trump administration. He has done nothing in the last two years that anyone who is in a position should living or affecting HIV to have a & # 39; believe that proper administrative officers will do their own.

It is worth remembering that this is the only administration that is proven to be & # 39; Developing policies that bring people who are in a position. live with HIV their healthcare and their basic human rights. Whether it is developing Medicaid expansion, and & # 39; abolish the costs of an Interactive Care Act for people who live in existing situations, and preventing people living with HIV from a & # 39; serving in the army or in Corps Peace, trying to find out about treatments for older people on Medicare, changing the Public Charge rule to prevent the prevention of HIV de facto and a financial litmus test on in- migrants who are coming to the United States, or any of the discriminatory actions that are opposed to LGBTQ people who are ill- live in the country, Trump's administration has shown again and again not our friend and not his trust; there.

And yet, I think we should work with Trump administration on its plan to end HIV infection. Based on what we have seen so far, much of the management plan seems to have a roadmap reflection led by a & # 39; community to end HIV infection in the United States by 2025 developed by AIDS United and the Act now: End of AIDS and agreed with over 250 HIV service organizations last year. This is not an accident, but the result of the hard work of HIV has suggested that they have seen an opportunity to influence the design of those in power in a way that would benefit those who live with HIV. It is undoubtedly that Secretary HHS, Alex Azar and CDC Director, Robert Redfield, MD are not the electorate of many HIV-based elections for these critical headquarters, but they have a wide range of research , HIV prevention and treatment against HIV disease is a major priority. As HIV advocates, our work is to influence their conclusions so large & n. as we can with its accessible accessibility; us.

In order to be clear, none of this means that we should change our approach to dealing with many Trump administration attacks on people who are in a position. live with HIV outside this plan. No sum of the funding included in this plan is to compromise the damage; is done by a home-based business directory that provides tolerance based sex education; committing crime from causing any, We do not have to administer the Trump but to be so passionate and persistent in opposition to its policies that are largely aspirational. But we should not refuse to plan a plan to end HIV infection by 2030 because of where it came from, and those who are capable of doing everything we do to shape this plan in our image of the At the same time as we fight anti-Trump administration on so many other places.

[Editor’s Note: While Drew Gibson is an employee of AIDS United, the statements in this article reflect his views alone.]

Drew Gibson is an independent writer and AIDS United policy group in Washington, D.C. You can follow on Twitter at @SuppressThis do not visit the "Virally Suppressed" photocopy that is & # 39; covering a wide range of topics related to health and public health and social justice.

Source link