SC's orders to leave vs. Gwen Garcia



The High Court says Sandiganbayan did not make illegal permission when he impeded a Cebu resident from leaving the country

Published 10:50 PM, February 05, 2019

Updated 10:51 PM, Feb 05, 2019

DECISION. The SC confirms the departure orders brought against the representative of 3rd District Gwendolyn Garcia at Cebu. Photograph from Garcia office

DECISION. The SC confirms the departure orders brought against the representative of 3rd District Gwendolyn Garcia at Cebu. Photograph from Garcia office

MANILA, Philippines – The High Court (SC) has certified the order of the complainant court, Sandiganbayan, to block the 3rd district representative of Gwendolyn Garcia at Cebu 3 from his / her; leaving the country.

The SC awarded 3 exit orders (HDO)) that the Sandiganbayan defeated Garcia on 24 July 2012 in connection with the controversial building in Bailili, which Garcia bought as Cebu's ruler but was underwater water .

At present, his / her conveyance is Look at two accounts of greed and any count of technical adverse effects over their irregular cause.

Garcia allowed the HDOs before the SC refused to move the Sandiganbayan to rethink it.

Garcia argued that Sandiganbayan's HDOs were in opposition to the fact that he believes that the court does not have the authority to take their grievance against it; travel abroad.

But the High Court said there was so much Garcia petition. (LÀIR: Is there a game for Gwen Garcia following an Ombudsman's order of defense?)

"Everyone told him that the Sandiganbayan did not make a bad choice, much less of a disgrace, was unable to refusal to rethink and pray for the construction of the HDOs that were brought against the petitioner. The HDOs were issued legitimately in accordance with their respective powers as a court of justice, "said the SC.

The SC said that the Sandiganbayan "is full of authority" over the case of Garcia, who is " means that a court can provide accreditation in terms of arrest, HDOs, and "another process that it considers may be entitled to it under the circumstances."

"In this case, the Sandiganbayan worked within their sovereignty when he put the HDOs against the petitioner," said the SC.

On January 22, Garcia lost another visit of appeals in her admitted case in Sandiganbayan. – Rappler.com


Source link