The court was a The rule that former former Humenné wage paid illegal awards


The old appellant must return the prizes.

Deputy Chief Humenne, and Town Member, Maria C., must be able to; return unpaid money to the town. The Senate decided to make a Regional Court in Prešov. Interpreter Vladimir Kostilnik continued in similar things.

In 2011, the Higher Audit Office (SAO) found that the former senior maestro, his position and the landlords were entitled to unqualified salary.

"At the same time, the SSA stated in the report that it is essential for the government to" take action to eliminate the identified problems ". Based on the results of the SHA, the city's leadership, with Chief Executive Jana Vaľáá, has started to get out of the previous senior master and his paid office by breaking the law, "said a & # 39; City council in a press release says that the total debt of Maria C represents about 7000 euros.

More than 4,000 pounds

As TASR informed this, a spokesman of the KS in Prešov Ivan Petrufová said that the Senate had adjudicated the Humenne District Court in May in the statement of the defendant's duty to pay the applicant Humenne 4560,38 experience with exhibitions and also in the cost statement. Appeals Court, according to its other words, is & # 39; initially endorsed the decision of the court that the money paid by the complainant to the defendant for the period from November 2009 to December 2010 was a salary of more than 50 % pay the salary salary without reasonable cause, thus bringing the legally illegally rich.

"At the same time, the Court Appeals allowed the applicant to give compensation for the cost of appeal applications in respect of the person to defend 100%," she said. Birth at 21.11. valid.

The old Deputy Manager did not wish to comment on this case because she had no official decision from KS.

"I was surprised to read in the regional news report, Vales report, that there was a lawsuit in a regional court that we do not know about," she told the media, saying that he is later. Any opportunity for appeal will be considered to the High Court (SR).

The reporter surprised the result

Former Chief Executive Kostilník believes that his / her home's complaint is discriminated against. According to the SHA, the rulers of their home were also illegally paid, and including Vales, according to their words.

"It is true that the seaman has invited everyone to return money," he said to the media. But his home was only a attacking him and his position. The Kostilnik was successful in the area and regional courts. The town has submitted an incredible application in this regard, the SN has not yet been decided.

His previous office failure in court has stopped. "They did not have the same law, but they seemed," he explained. Petrufová said in that opinion that her & # 39; court in disputes based on a different legal basis.

"I was paid in accordance with the Town Hall Premium and the Town Council paid the salary (basic and prize, TASR note)," said Kostilník, saying he can not Strengthening himself without having to find out the assets he has received homeowners' approval. Those, according to their other words, also decided to have 50% of the sea-level award; 5% of the salary earned the prize and the applicants were, and so was also the intention.

"The district court said they should be paid out of the basic salary, but they did not say anything in the resolution of the basic plot," he said. He also indicated that, in the case of Members, there was a budget of around EUR 19 000.

Similar issues, different ideas

As stated in his home response to the TASR given by Maria Míčková from the Humenne Town Hall, the town went on in the & # 39; opinion on the SAO protocol, which stated that the Chief Executive, Deputy Representatives and Electors had no remuneration.

"After the two circumstances, he concluded that the legal opinion of the courts was equivalent to the SIA's opinion in the case of Maria C. and in Mr Kostilnik's case, the court did not give a legal opinion of the SIP," said in The town thinks that the town is right.

"In both cases, the court was otherwise ruled, although there was one resolution, and so the town would have to wait for the court's legal opinion before ; 24 members agree, as court tax costs for the production of 24 separate acts would definitely exceed the money the town would return back to this case. And the salary of the delegates did not depend on the applicant's awards but on maritime rewards. Her court confirmed to prove that the order for the requester's salary had enough agreement in the ambassadors, even though it was in the minute, "a & # 39; explain their address in response.

Source link