Zuckerberg defended a company at a Friday meeting with staff



SAN FRANCISCO – Mark Zuckerberg has been carefully defended on Facebook in a question and answer session with Friday afternoon staff, and pushed back against him; criticized his company after the New York Times investigated how he influenced Russia's influential jobs.

In an hourly video conference that was broadcast to Facebook offices around the world, Mr Zuckerberg responded to questions from staff on a range of topics, from Facebook's behavior over the last 18 months as which should handle deductions to the media, according to three people who are familiar with the debate but were not willing to discuss in public because it was a private meeting.

The idea that Facebook was trying to "do anything" was dead, Mr Zuckerberg said, using the full answer to the answer, according to those people. Some staff responded confidently and vigorously.

The session came in a hard time for the social network, as activists encouraged to deal with a large amount of compromise on the company. Facebook spokesman refused to comment on the Friday meeting.

On Wednesday, the Times commented on striking at the highest levels of Facebook how they will deal with Russian unfamiliar work and provide information on data privacy protection. In particular, there was a big deal between Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook's main operating officer, and Alex Stamos, a leading security officer.

"Yup, Sheryl Sandberg told me," said Mr Stamos in A comment published in The Washington Post Saturday. "I was not confident that we discovered everything that the Russians were going to do, and it was as possible that there would be worse issues before we built the teams and created the technology to us, It's necessary to stop it. Sheryl – as was reported in the New York Times research this week – her feeling was unhappy with this (later apologized) "

A company had also been appointed on Public Affairs Definers, Washington, D.C., a consultancy firm to investigate simple investigations against Facebook critics. The definitions also linked George Soros, the volunteer finance, to anti-Facebook groups. Facebook had a link to its & # 39; company after the publication of The Times.

In announcing a conference with Thursday reporters, Mr Zuckerberg criticized the definitions of his company and stated that he and Ms. Sandberg were not aware of the particular work the company was doing. out to & # 39; do. He said that someone could have had their company 's communications staff been in a position; hiring Definers, although he then gave support to support for the "hard work".

"In general, we need to go through all our relationships and evaluate what might be the normal DC relationship and a decision that we want to continue," said Mr Zuckerberg on his # 39; call.

Mr Zuckerberg said that he had had a great deal of criticism over his last 18 months – in particular regarding security of security, contentuality and mishehavior – was fair and important.

Ms. Sandberg, who was present at the session, "I accept the responsibility for Mines," according to two who are familiar with his / her; conversation. "That was me."

But Mr Zuckerberg and Ms. Sandberg said. The Times research was "completely unfair" and at times "not really true".

Much of the debate was based on encouraging staff morale. Elliot Schrage, former vice president of Facebook on global communications and public policy, returned to the company for the Friday meeting.

Mr Schrage said that Facebook was in a difficult journey, and that things would finally be down, and he asked staff to be in a position; try to make the best possible and work hard on the company's hardships.

Some Facebook staff commented that they believe the Times and other news venues are " focus on the company unbalanced because of its impact – an opinion divided into the session on Friday when it was written; ask staff on agents that will happen to staff who will notify the press.

Mr Zuckerberg made it clear that Facebook would not find it difficult for staff to talk to The New York Times or other publications. But after a member of staff asked if the company should report on how many people helped Facebook find and burn, Mr Zuckerberg dismissed his / her opinion.

Reductions are usually caused by "confident questions."


Source link