The Executive Director of the California Athletics Commission, Andy Foster, is an advocate of anti-drug measures. He also supports the UFC Anti-Doping Group (UDA) party mission.
But after trying to look like it was & # 39; Jon Jones' last case, he does not want USADA to take part in judging cases in California.
"I think it's good to control dop," said Foster today with MMAjunkie. "I think it was a breakdown in this process, and I think we've learned from the process. If we keep doing this to the campaigners, that does not serve public interest. "
At a hearing today in Sacramento, Calif., Foster said that the commission made a mistake when it was suspended to USADA on the second resistance against drugs from Jones, who came from a positive drug test after UFC 214. He praised The commission would be & # 39; Permits a temporary basis, which cleared the route for reconstruction with Alexander Gustafsson at UFC 232.
In February, she continued to. commissioned by Jones, sent a fine of $ 205,000 and ordered a community service. But he kept off on a croft that may normally be ordered, and reasoned that Jones was punished in a case with USADA, who is entitled to convicted campaigners in his partnership with the UFC.
He took another seven months for his anti-drug group to solve his & her; his case with Jones after both sides went to arbitration. Jones received a 15-month croft – three months less than a USADA proposal after reducing a four-year suspension that could be 30 months in exchange for Jones to give information about the breach doctors of other athletes.
Contributing to that, Foster said, that Jones needed to protect additional financial liabilities to resolve his case in California, which is punished by the state law that has only jurisdiction. And that was on top of the loss of a reputation that was made when USADA stated that there was a potential for anti-drug poverty in line with its policy by UFC athletes at the time.
"I do not think the process is right," said Foster. "I think the law is keeping my thoughts."
UFC has changed its policy from then on to inform the public only when a case has been resolved against drugs, a move that supports Foster. But he said that there is a bigger case when USADA criticizes cases in which he is also a major researcher.
"It's not just a struggle, but it's a kind of conflict," he said. "I do not say they're doing, but … there is a comment on strife. They have a special interest in ensuring their science is correct.
"You understood, I do not say (there is a conflict of interest). But there is a comment, and I say this: I believe that there were a number of issues that could to be resolved faster and cheaper and the same results instead have been going through this long, difficult process. "
Moving on, Foster said it's likely that his & commissioned anti-drug issues that include UFC athletes as previously done, with commission announcing affirmative penalties, (if any), and notice of right of appeal.
In terms of how the UFC athlete's product is changing with the USADA content now known in the administrative discipline of Stòrlann Bogsie Commission, Foster, who attends a number of ABC committees, & # 39 ; give that case to another time.
"The main thing is that we do not provide a guiding choice of living-citizens for a third party drug test company who has the potential – without saying that most of conflicts there, "he said.
In a Monday call call, Foster sent his concerns to USADA in a "pleasing" conversation. He said that the very drug organization plans to hold a meeting with active directors of the athletic commissions in which business is in business; address issues that have arisen in her program.
At the same time, Jones stresses his options for his / her. licensing a further drug control group – or a free-medical challenge group led by doctor Margaret Goodman, formerly an Athletic Company in Nevada, for proofing in the bid to UFC 232. Their -According to USADA, VADA only enhances the test results to its commission, which is then a & # 39; Decide the right action to be taken.
If he agrees to take part, the Jones commission will pay back for $ 18,000 to $ 20,000, it is expected to cost between eight and 10 tests. CSAC commissioner, Martha Shen-Urquidez, said that Jones would be confirmed and paid back, and would show that he would to participate calmly in beliefs.
"In my wonderful idea – at present I give my opinion a bit – it's best that Mr Jones decides to do this volunteer and is not essential , "said CSAC chairman, John Carvelli, to Jones today during the hearing. "We hope you're going to do this and do this, for you. I think Commissioner Martha makes it clear to you what's involved here. "
But for Foster, however, it is more than just what Jones is. From now on, the same partnership asks from USADA as a collector – adds the results to it, and allows its commission to be deleted.
For more than UFC 232, check the UFC extract section of the site.