On the afternoon of November 20, the Panel continued with the first "trie gambling" case. Defender Nguyen Thanh Hoa continued on his podium quiz to report to the Research Panel.
Defense of Nguyen Thanh Hoa in court 20/11.
Earlier, the person is not protected on the same day, which protects NV, the CNC Technology Development Limited Company of the C50 company from 2011-2015. The CNC was officially CNC's company since May 14, 2015 according to Decision 158 with the accused Phan Van Vinh.
However, this afternoon hearing, the Panel tells the person's report, the content of this defense is confirmed from 2011-2015. The C50 is a CNC company and a monthly CNC season must report to the public. Working for the C50.
HĐXX asked the person who asked Hoa that the direct statement was mentioned, Mr Hoa said: "When the convicted person was arrested, his camp was very hot, people were not tired, sturdy and so the defendant named secretary evidence. gathered in the case ".
The guardian said the C50 was not CNC 2011-2015.
The panel will speak, when do you know CNC is a? Collaborate with VTC online to run gambling games? Bao told the officer when the Public Security Ministry sent an official letter dated 27/5/2016 to confirm this content.
"As a director of the Q50, what do the defendants think about when the game is publicly publicized online?" Mr Hoa said. C50 is a technical unit, if it is; detecting criminal behavior signs. The management of this case belongs to another specialist group.
Then, representatives from the provost named some of the familiarizations of experts who know that a CNC online collaboration with a CNC to run a play gaming breaks the law is reported, but not He does not provide proof. Regarding these statements, the accused confirmed that Hoa was wrong.
Responding to the lawyer's question in the court, Hoa's defenseist said and Phan Van Vinh never had a & # 39; talk to help with CNC's work of online players.
Also, responding to a lawyer & # 39; questioning the people's view, Hoa's defenseist said: "First, my complaint was made for" organized gaming ", and moved to" Badly used in a situation, as long as I had "I said I did not have a lawsuit right, I only understand it in this case that I am not worried that I do not worry, and so I should be "unhealthy. "new right".
The complaint, in terms of the purposes, cause, Nguyen Thanh Hoa, told the company that CNC surrender would be a creating: "the income from this pilot activity is used to invest a security system, national crime is the strategic work of the High Crime Crime Department of High-Crime." Indeed, over the next two years After all, CNC companies have played on the internet for thousands of trillions of unprofitable profits, without any money from this gearing activity being deposited in the National Criminal Protection System that is only A small portion of the total income ($ 700 million and a $ 30,000 Symantec antivirus series for the prevention of high crime crime prevention). At the same time, Nguyen Van Duong's play-in is fully responsible for his & her; the decision Phan Van Vinh and Nguyen Thanh Hoa. So, in terms of nature, the behavior of Phan Van Vinh and Nguyen Thanh Hoa reflects "conservation".
Therefore, Nguyen Thanh Hoa's behavior review was stopped at the level of crime-related causes "Affecting state and power while they were responsible "as set out in Item 3 of Article 281 of the Code. Crimes in 1999, but the conditions that are favorable to the protection prescribed in Article 7 of the Criminal Code, Nguyen Thanh Hoa criminal acts will be dealt with in accordance with the Item, Section 2 of Article 356 of the Penal Code. 2015, will be reviewed in 2017.