According to the conviction of the Ha Tinh People's Democracy, at 16h.m. to 31/5/2016, Phan Dinh Quan (SN 1980, living in Ky Phu Commune, Ky Anh, Ha Tinh Province) a & # 39; Control the truck that carries BKS 38C-073.05. Follow National Highway 1A, from Ky Dong to Ky Tien commune.
When they go to Km 548 National Highway 1A at Ky Tien Commune, Ky Anh District, Ha Tinh Province, drivers unnecessary drivers removed from National 1A Road, turn right onto the interconnected roads, Commune to the Ky Tien Commune People's Task Force attack triggers Bikes 38M1-218.54 accidents with an electric motors, under the control of Hoang Duc Phuong (SN 1998, located in Ky Giang commune, Ky Anh district, Ha Tinh province). The Phuong disaster was pulled to the car.
When he realized that he was causing the disaster, Phan Dinh Quan stopped and jumped into the car that Phuong is lying without moving on the back of his face; car. Then, Phan Dinh Quan is on his car; runs over the victim's head, causing the victim to break the brain to death.
During the first day of the trial session (19/11), Procurator Fiscal Quan still claimed that there is a danger to & # 39; move over the head of Phuong as a result of riot. Apart from that, even if a & # 39; The court had to be honest but Quan had to say that the victim had previously died (when the Army did not move through second suffering – PV).
The test lasted for one whole day, but the families were injured and the people gathered in the hall to see information about the case.
The accident happened when you turn the disaster on the right and it has shown that the road sign, which looks like a rear view is a person behind him.
"Listen to the person who attacked the" sound ", but he did not know the disaster, car problems should go down, see boys under the wheel, blood flowing. to rescue, wait for a minute that no-one should be supported, "said Quan.
Send & # 39; court told the accident about the accident, Quan sent for a minute and said: "The security was circulated, and there is a sense of refusal, but he correctly sent out the number of cars.
During the test, the constant was always a step and kept silent.
Given that the defendant was not honest, the chairman summarized the certification of previous exams as well as witnesses, and refused Army evidence. The seven witnesses confirmed that the driver did not turn the sign, when he got off the car for about 40 seconds and jumped into the boat for driving away, not to & # 39; rescue.
"In addition to that, it was 40 seconds that the person who attacked his car and went on board the car, tried to to ask someone to help it. & The main issue of the driver's impact, caused as a result of the disaster, is the first thing The person who suffers to take care, not to keep a car, "said the chairman.
Attorney General Nguyen Khac Tuan (who represents the victims of the victim) asked many questions: why after the accident, the accused person but still still relaxing to buy the project for victims; Having been driving for many years, how is the use of forward and back like? How long did the pressed amount be & # 39; going past and what time? … The soldiers went calmly to refuse a response.
On the other hand, at the test, the army was recorded in the previous test and its entirety process with its & # 39; survey body, the defendant's statements are not entirely subject to torture. But when the lawyer asked the victim: Are the people who are suffering; Protect today to continue to & # 39; disturbed or false statements? The defendant still chooses the right.
The convener's representative found a lot of relevant evidence that the defendant was persuaded.
He said the decision-making panel would be based on legal and scientific reasons, but the person's certification was not always protected, regret, regret.
At a lawyer, a representative told her; fiscal that the accused person's behavior was particularly heavy, causing a public problem, bad adverse awareness to his family, and political security. due to the loss of social security. This behavior needs to be treated very much and the person should be protected from the society for a long time.
The defendant was taken to a car and prison after completing the test.
When the Panel said for the last defender, Quan sent a slightly reduced sentence to come with his family but no family had any harm to the family.
Although the Panel is guilty of protection but the victim's mother is not yet passionate, and weakens his name.
Following a review of the situation that is increasingly aging and causing, Phan Dinh Quan Panel published 12 years imprisonment for murder under Section 2, Article 93 of the Criminal Code 1999. emergency compensation for family damage 172 million.
Tien Hiep – Van Dung