Why did not you explain unnecessary property management? | Society



[ad_1]

No more than 50% plan

Prior to the approval of NA, who presented the report on comments from NA representatives, Le Thi Nga, Chairman of the Committee, said. However, many MPs have accepted the plan to handle assets and increase revenue. Initially unreasonable submission during the court's review and resolution process.

In addition, there are many ideas that welcome to & # 39; dealing with a tax collection and proof of current law, where this property and income is treated when the appropriate authority declares guilty or crime . This is a big case, associated property rights, the fundamental rights of citizens under the Constitution should be considered.

At every discussion on this subject, the views of MPs and related agencies are very different and scattered. Therefore, the Sustainable Committee of the National Assembly is the direction of the General Secretary of the National Assembly for voting to MP.

Why did not you explain unnecessary property management? picture 1Vice President Judicial Committee Nguyen Manh Cuong: Nhu

As a result, 209/456 electors, reporting 43.09% of all MPs were agreeing to, consideration and situation in court; The plan for tax collection was approved by 156/456 (32.16%) representatives; 40 delegates advocated the law to maintain corruption and 51 presidents did not express their ideas or opinions. Therefore, none of the options provided by more than 50% of the total number of MPs.

The National Assembly's Sustainability Committee has discovered, due to a lack of consensus, that this content should be explored and made more precise when the mature, practical and ensured conditions . The law should be enabled. Therefore, it is recommended that the National Assembly does not; allows for the development of rules governing property, income and inappropriate explanations of origin in the draft law, which will, comply with what the current law is.

Extend the area of ​​corruption to the private sector

The lack of clarity on the problem store is particularly worried at its press conference after the meeting.

Responding to the Tien Phong PAP question, Deputy Chairman of the Committee said. Judge Nguyen Manh Cuong, when they were considering his & her; In this case, MPs said that this is a new, complex, problem-solving, property management There was no other truth for the first time it was set up. In fact, there are many different sources of wealth in the richness of seamen, civil servants in particular and the wider people and over time, many sources have no written evidence so far Original.

The state has no control over assets, income and we have no control. In addition, the system of tax collection or fund registration system, especially the money through the risk …

In terms of assets and income that do not clearly explain their source, ownership that can be proven by corruption or criminal activity can be preserved, returned and returned to proprietors . For payment of larger income tax financing, the tax offices will be transferred to the taxation offices for cure. If the control control agencies have a & ns; breach of the law or commit crime, they must turn to the relevant parties for consideration and handling.

For anonymous reporter and income, additional income is unnecessary, they need to deal strictly in accordance with the rules. In particular, applications for representatives of the People Council were deleted from the list of candidates; People who are planning to choose their roles will not be selected. With regard to other reporters, they will be dealt with by law on rooms and civil servants, of more or more warning intentions. People who have been planning for leadership roles need to be removed from planning.

According to Mr Cuong, this time, the National Assembly has carried out a broad review of the LAC and was voted with MPs with high votes. In the revised text, there are many important innovations, such as expanding private sector coverage; Overcoming deficiencies and shortcomings through the 10-year review of the LAC implementation. Progressive measures such as publicity, distribution, payment through accounts, gifts related to gifts … have changed, as well as, unwanted oversight and restrictions through use. implement.

"The law has also made an important step in managing property income. If current law is not only clear about the revenue source, this time will be Move to the control regime. In particular, the system of financial funders has strengthened one step closer, more radical. Therefore, proof of revenue funding will be tighter than the rules current, "said Cuong.

As a result, 209/456 electors, reporting 43.09% of all MPs were agreeing to, consideration and situation in court; The plan for tax collection was approved by 156/456 (32.16%) representatives; 40 delegates advocated the law to maintain corruption and 51 presidents did not express their ideas or opinions. Therefore, none of the options provided by more than 50% of the total number of MPs.

Representatives respond that the minister is not right

At a news conference, a & # 39; answering questions related to the debate between Liu Pyongyang and Nguyen Huu Cau, Secretary General of the National Assembly, Nguyen Hanh Phuc stated that BP member Liu Liu was at the last question. he asked the Minister for Security of Public Affairs, but Nguyen Huu Cau candidate again. Throughout, Mr Puc said, "Mr Liu Pyongyang data is not right."

After the debate, the chairman of the National Assembly asked the two exchange representatives to do with each other, and the Central Public Security Committee has written to a representative organization. Party Party of the National Assembly. Later on, the Delegation's delegation was changed and MP MP Liu Liu, directly with the media exchanges with reporters.

The Secretary General of the National Assembly also stated that questioning was the right to question; the UN rulers. "Unfortunately, the minister replied immediately, but another representative said," said Puc, saying that the principle of the question is that the MP would ask questions, and the ball The government is responsible for responding . Representatives may have discussions when they are considering economic, social and legal issues. "Representatives are not right for a response to their minister," said Puc.

Thanh Nam

Luan Innear

[ad_2]
Source link